कान्हा रे ssssssssssss
Aufbau is a German word for describing the principle by which electrons group-up in an atom. It is intriguing to learn that neutrons/protons/electron do not differ in their properties from element to another. Rather, it is the different configuration of these sub-atomic particles which yields different Elements. This blog is meant to describe my special configuration of events, which yields-Me. Human body is made of Elements; but human character is carved from Events.
Wednesday, September 09, 2020
अनूप जलोटा के भजन : कान्हा रे तू राधा बन जा
Tuesday, June 21, 2016
व्यक्तिव विकार से उत्पन्न अभद्र व्यवहार बनाम अनुचित व्यवहार
ज्यों ही यह सपष्ट हो जाता है की अन्तर्सम्बंधिय कलह का कारक व्यक्तित्व विकार से उत्पन्न अभद्र व्यव्हार हैं, मात्र अनुचित व्यवहार नहीं, तब फिर उसके आगे उचित व्यवहारों की सीख देना या टिपण्णी करना अपने में एक दर्द देयक कर्म हो जाता है उनके ऊपर जो की व्यतित्व विकार की पीड़ा को वहन कर रहा होता है।
Friday, July 12, 2013
the on-the-bench- attitude
Thursday, June 13, 2013
Types of reasonings
To a question such as 'why should we drive on the left side of the road' , some people may give reasoning such as 'because that is the requirement of law'. This is a non-critical reasoning where the reasoning being given is itself not explaining the cause but only stretching farther our reach from the causation.
Some may give the reasoning that keeping on left side of the road will all the traffic in the same direction along the same line, thereby avoiding the cross-traffic. This is normative, where he is explaining 'what is ought to be', i.e., what is desired to be. Does it explain to us why the choice of 'left side' over the 'right side' to achieve what is desired?
There can be reasoning of how in the historical perspective the design of the car in the early days lead to choice of left side over the right side. However this positivist, based on facts. But it misses out the legal requirement and the desires, the purposes.
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
the faulted criticism of education system in India
This aspect of logic has a been a very significant cause of problem with the Critics, such as Shri Anupam Kher, when they worked in movies such as "Paathshala" and "F.A.L.T.U", or even "3 Idiots".
Anti-educationism is not a logically worth criticism of Education System.
Can the learning process ever be detached away from books, reading and writing? A man surely 'learns' from his own mistake, but does that process of learning also mean 'education', that which can be reasoned as a 'intended action to bring in some desired and planned change in human behaviour'. learning from own mistake is an accidental learning and cannot contribute to the development of society, because each individual will have to keep doing the same sets of mistakes again in each generation to learn from its own mistakes. Such a learning is personalised learning of the individual from his personal upliftment, the social and collective upliftment of humans through its generation will be a negated aspect in such a learning.
Therefore, learning has to come about through learning from books or whatever process which upholds study of the compilation of knowledge in some form or the other. This will mean that a collection of worthwhile knowledge in each field will have to be created , collection of the individualised learning of the people from the past who had "learned something from their own mistakes", and then such a collection be given the noun called "books". The faulted critics have focused to hard on having the education 'freed' from the books, calling it by references and names such as "books worms", "bookish knowledge", "book knowledge is not everything", etc. Perhaps the critics should have emphasised on the correct philosophical meaning of what is a Book and discuss the limitations of book-learning instead of name-calling all the books.
Listen to beautiful and soulful song from movie '3 idiots', "behati hawa sa tha woh, udati patang sa tha woh..". The songs surely calls for "freedom" when it calls references of blowing wind, flying kites, et al. But is the relevance of "freedom" in education correctly understood by our dear the faulted 'critics of Education system in India'. Isn't freedom in the political and social context mis-represented in this song, thereby imparting, however unwittingly, the wrong meaning of Freedom (in the political and social context), to its listeners.
Can students and learning ever be separated away from discipline aspect which is required by one to impose on himself to acquire understanding of the complex topics in natural science ? The what sort of 'freedom' was the worthy criticism of Education system ? To answer to this question, references will have to be drawn from ancient times when the Education system was just beginning to find birth in human societies. In "3 Idiots", the character of Aamir Khan simply roams around in the campus with his hands slipped in the pockets, and yet coming 'first' in all the subjects? How casually , simplistically and "easily" have they portrayed 'freedom' to be the winner, dumping the relevance of self-discipline, hard-work, all that is traditionally understood to be mandatory for a scholar. Some of the learning process have to come around only when humans have luxury and freedom to think it out on their own accord those aspects of nature and natural sciences, but the context of "freedom" is about the freedom of individual level, constrained through a self-imposed discipline and hard-work. Freedom from social obligations is not to correct meaning of freedom in this reference , that a teacher Mr "Virus" can be fooled off so simplistically.
In ancient times, when philosophers such as Aristotle were laying the first stones of what would become Educations System when centuries later, the criticism and debates had rolled off between charity teachers such as Aristotle, and Money-oriented teachers who were opposed to Aristotle's belief of "education is a must for the upliftment of human race , so it should be given away free to everyone". The beginning of commercialised education had found existence at that very moment when Education system was founded. And then, the rise of 'profression education' was a posteriori to Commercial teaching. Against this charity teaching of Aristotle could not find as many "scholastic learning" students. Although the aspect of expansion of human advancement has been that most of the new researches have come from the non-profressional learners, who did their work out of hobby, or simply the love of learnining something. From Newton, to Darwin, to Einstein, the names of be to many more such 'learners'. The criticism of "professional" purpose learners was about not having "freedom" to work in their own direction , in researching and trying new things but simply doing away with what have been acquired from the money-oriented commercialised teachers.
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Why do they teach 'History and Civics'
CLASS XII (ISC BOARD)
Saturday, June 30, 2012
Sunday pleasure readings
Science is broadly understood as collecting, analyzing, publishing, reanalyzing, critiquing, and reusing data.
source website : Open Science ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_science )
Definition of Transparency :
Transparency, as used in science, engineering, business, the humanities and in a social context more generally, implies openness, communication, and accountability. Transparency is operating in such a way that it is easy for others to see what actions are performed. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_(behavior))
Transparency can be defined as successful two-way communication about public policy. The institutional arrangements that make it possible reflect national culture, history and values.
However, transparency starts from a core set of measures that are so fundamental as to
be almost indistinguishable from governments’ basic legislative, administrative and
fiscal functions. Core measures help to ensure that people who are affected by policies
know about them and can respond to them. Guidelines for good transparency practices
have emerged in the fiscal and regulatory areas. (http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/45/22/2506884.pdf).
What is Plutocracy ? :
Plutocracy (from Ancient Greek ploutos, meaning "wealth", and kratos, meaning "power, rule") is rule by the wealthy, or powerprovided by wealth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy
Examples
What is Privacy ? :
Privacy (from Latin: privatus "separated from the rest, deprived of something, esp. office, participation in the government", from privo "to deprive") is the ability of an individual or group to seclude themselves or information about themselves and thereby reveal themselves selectively. The boundaries and content of what is considered private differ among cultures and individuals, but share basic common themes. Privacy is sometimes related to anonymity, the wish to remain unnoticed or unidentified in the public realm. When something is private to a person, it usually means there is something within them that is considered inherently special or personally sensitive. The degree to which private information is exposed therefore depends on how the public will receive this information, which differs between places and over time. Privacy partially intersects security, including for instance the concepts of appropriate use, as well as protection, of information. Privacy may also take the form of bodily integrity. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy#Privacy_law)
More reading on what is privacy (http://www.privacy.gov.au/aboutprivacy/what )
Disclosure of an undisclosed information about a person in the public domain constitutes a breach of privacy.
What is Secrecy ?
Views on secrecy
| Wikiquote has a collection of quotations related to: Secrets |
Friday, April 13, 2012
About nature of man as a theorist , and the "fundas"
Further, I often think that since all of us, each of us , have our own funda on everything, the real genius from amongst us is the one who can create a "theory" from all the conflicting fundas that each of us has given. A cogent, robustly argued, 'theory", a finished product from the brownian movement of "funda" particles, which combine up to form a substance , a solid.
Most people like to give fandas, but only the rare ones can take the effort to collate all the fundas and create a theory out of it. They are the real genius.
Thus, i hearby, create a difference between a "funda" and a "theory" by my authority of a freeborn man who as a nature's will has been awarded a power to give his own "fundas".
:-).
:-P.
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
The great challenge in law and commerce in a democractic set-up
Saturday, March 10, 2012
About the means of fulfilling man's interest in the future
1) Prudence : When man's today's action are governed such as to avoid a possible negative outcome which has been observed in a similar situation in the past.
2) Anticipation: a scientific method in which the future outcome is predicated basis the rate of action happening today, or the psychological behaviour pattern already studied. The method involves use of natural sciences- mathematics, physics, psychology, etc.
3) Fortune telling: unscientific methods which involves undefined,unproved theories in palmistry, astrology, numerology, etc. This method often involves artistic skills from specially bestowed people who we are required to believe in.
Micro-level and Macro-level of observing a situation
In a macro level, a man has to keep a mental image of the map of the area, that is, a top side view of the zone, and then relate his own headings at each of the courses he has to do while reaching his destination. This is macro level, or "the big picture" of the situation, which the English often keep calling on us to look at whenever any problem situation arises. Macro level observations require great deal of imaginations skill from a person which is often developed through driving and travelling.
Indians being a non-exploring community, are generally lacking in the macro level observational skill. The rural indians are more definitively a lot.
Sunday, November 27, 2011
Sansmaran, TV Serial, 1995
Plot
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Essay on Criticism ..by Alexander Pope ..General Outline
Thursday, October 20, 2011
The best captain i sailed under
What did you like about the best Master you sailed with? And flip the question around and tell us what you disliked in the worst? No names . Just adjectives!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Good master = high knowledge, which imbibes in him polite-ness.I want to make this clear because high knowledge may also translate into eruditism - show off of knowledge.
Good behavior and good virtues result out of intuition
developed through erudition and scholarship. 'cool as cucumber, rock
solid, never panicked' , all should result from a balanced growth of
knowledge and the experience.
inexperienced. Oldies have advantage of talking out with various
authorities with lots of ease. When the mate is experienced enough, a
combination on board with a senior master, helps.
New ships, better conditions, better systems. Less works, empty minds, devils workshop! It is often in this type of climate that people begin to find time to get involved into each other. Senior ranks ofte develop a penchant, a psychiatric trouble truthfuly, to go after people, one or many. They never realise this but that is how it has been commonly felt. In these conditions erroneous philosophies breed. Wrong conversations, wrong dialogues, wrong rhetorics, wrong cultures sprout up, absorbed by wrong students and later pratices and promulgated as the practical or maybe the right knowledge.
Therefore it is essential that the senior ranks should have a hobby to follow if the have to maintain their good state of mind, an eventually a good culture on board.
In summary, Management ranks should stay DETACHED- that is, not much involved into persons for shipboard works. This helps in balancing various emotional turbulence that nature of work brings about. However, a personal connection with every crew on affairs which maybe not ship-work related, helps in motivating and keeping the morale high of crew members.
Detachment, in Bhagvad Geeta described as 'nirmoh', is an important quality. It can also be understood as objectivity in conduct and decision making.
Data is collected with objectivity, both sides heard, and then analysed with
empathy,that is, applying emotional understanding for all parties. Rare people can
exercise such conduct.
Saturday, October 15, 2011
Open Reflection on Collective Thinking
http://takethesquare.net/2011/07/31/quick-guide-on-group-dynamics-in-peoples-assemblies/
Open Reflection on Collective Thinking
While we would like to share our impressions so far, we encourage you to continue to reflect on and debate these impressions as we feel that Collective Thinking is an essential part of our movement.
To our understanding, Collective Thinking is diametrically opposed to the kind of thinking propounded by the present system. This makes it difficult to assimilate and apply. Time is needed, as it involves a long process. When faced with a decision, the normal response of two people with differing opinions tends to be confrontational. They each defend their opinions with the aim of convincing their opponent, until their opinion has won or, at most, a compromise has been reached.
The aim of Collective Thinking, on the other hand, is to construct. That is to say, two people with differing ideas work together to build something new. The onus is therefore not on my idea or yours; rather it is the notion that two ideas together will produce something new, something that neither of us had envisaged beforehand. This focus requires of us that we actively listen, rather than merely be preoccupied with preparing our response.
Collective Thinking is born when we understand that all opinions, be these opinions our own or others’, need to be considered when generating consensus and that an idea, once it has been constructed indirectly, can transform us.
Do not be discouraged: we are learning; we’ll get there: all that’s needed is time.
But surely there is something happening out there.!
There is Anti-Corruption protest in India, there is Arab Springs, There is Indignados in Spain and Italy, Jasmine in China,
Saturday, September 24, 2011
I am...
sketches on a piece of paper, or even a whiteboard. I keep good
interest in music, I like to hum and even sing; and yes, I do that in
full view of the public not in some dark cornor or only in a bathroom.
I am quite restless and often wake up in the middle of the night to
read something and to write something, much as this blog I am writing
right now. I compose as I think on something. I think, I like to think
on various topics not because they interest me, but because I am
restless. I make admission of that. I do not know what that might
amount to mean. I have brains working hard and in overdrive. I think
of arguments and the ways to resolve them. I think of their resolution
as I begin to polish my areas of logic in the grey matter. I think of
art and also of logics. I also write small computer programmes often
times at night. So , that's how my brain works. Logics, flowchart and
algorithms of an event circle my thoughts on almost every topic. I
think of history and that's what I love to read. history builds the
flowchart and algorithm of event we see today in its fragmented form.
I don't like to see in isolation. I like to think in Integration. I
evaluate and deliver verdicts. I like to compare. I reject things
being different from each other. I think philosophy connects them all.
I think there is brahma, a cosmic theory that connects all matters to
each other, a theory of everything. I like to read stephen hawkings. I
like to read daniel coleman. Like tom friedman, like bart kosko. I
read them all. I read Wikipedia and the encyclopedia and Encarta and
the brittanicas.
I don't like to live life in a specific cast. I carve out new shapes
and the new outcomes. I act to react. I act basically because I am
creative. I react because I don't appear to live in a cast. I am not
reactive , I am creative. People are reactive , who live in a specific
cast. Who give responses to a specific query of logic in a specific
way. I create, so new answer come out. But since they don't match the
responses of the predetermined cast, its me who appears to be
reacting. I am cool and peaceful. I have patience to teach and to
tolerate. People appreciate my teaching instincts and my skills. I
understand a learner's pain and dilemma and innovate ways to resolve
them. I like to help and spread the light of knowledge which I have
earned by my personal effort with hard work. I am a man. A man who
theorises everything he sees or believes, I am not dumb to just accept
what I am given to accept. I agree and I strongly disagree. I reject
and I also make amends.
I am a thinker . I am not a plain listener or an agreer. I am a
leader not a follower. I formulate results , just don't accept them. I
can dare to reject things right from it's origin thought. I arrive at
answer on my own and like to tally it with that of the world. I belong
to this world because my answers match those of other thinking men
around. I am not any ordinary man living life a with street smart
philosophy. I am a long time striker. I am not virtuous , I am logical
, who derives the logic of actions which people call the virtues. So I
appear to be virtuous. I have new unheard answers and explanations ,
and in plenty. I am not moral, but ethical. I see ethics as the
product of laws of nature. I live between plants and animals to know
the laws of nature. I know nature is cruel and that human emotions
defy cruelty and demand love. I know emotions are natural too and
humans and mammals have this unique gift. I know only mammals suckle
their young one and mothers do it out of love due to nature's call.
Fathers look after children out of nature's call . Emotions are gifts
to higher species of animal life. So I respect emotions . I carry them
in plenty and in variety.
I am sensitive, as I wake up early in the morning when temperatures
change, and then I like to take a stroll. I go back to sleep when
temperatures turn back in little warmer around noon. I sleep small and
frequent. I don't sleep hard and long. I am virtually always awake. I
don't get disturbed by sounds and discomfort. I can accept discomfort
for some durations. I sleep like a labourer , small, in-gaps work
sleep. I take a morning stroll almost everyday. I like to sit in
toilet and talk to mirrors. I am apparently an absentee and skiving
from work. But in my believes I work really hard and really honest. I
often expose the rights and wrongs in what people often just do up. I
think of my work and train myself on it. I am therefore explosive and
not easy to meet with. I am confined and don't like to disturb people.
But I am a nonsense to authorities because I often refuse to just live
it up. I settle and unsettle the authority of a person. Therefore they
like me and most of them dislike me, I am very very sensitive to issue
of personal freedom and therefore highly democratic . I demand and I
grant. I am Political. I am not among those who fear the consequences
of excessive freedom of untrained uncivilized human. I believe in
civilizations and know that it comes from training up people. But the
mass training doesn't happen by exercising control but by
demonstrating out how to do it. I know of methods for mass recruitment
and training. I don't select a few. I select all. And carve out the
rare wise ones who can lead further up by demonstrating. I touch the
heart as I touch their dilemma. I read their minds.
Am I a liberal democrat?
Thursday, April 28, 2011
To the mentor of my Dharma
Someone who was more than my own father, someone the Guru of life. Someone who taught us Dharma-- someone who lifted us from the common man's domain of Morality-living, in to the domain of Ethical-living, where things are more cris-crossed and arguing. He was the Brahman of my life-- the one who introduced me the fact that understanding Brahma is most complex thing one can attempt -- and something which come only from one's constant Karma, no matter good or not-- the ethics. Dharma churns out as one proceeds along the path of karma. Ethics become the source for general prudence in the journey of life.
How else would a person from my set-up rise up to think of doing what none of my fellows do or accept. A personal self-awkening was a spontaneous process which happened way back after senior secondary education. But it needed a mentor to find its direction. It needed someone to let balance between the arts and science. The self-awakening was triggered by constant presuring in the field of sciences and logics. An observational and tatse-ful view into Arts was starving. He showed the door to the new long path of appreciation of Arts. That Nirmoh- or Objectvism is the key point to follow both Logics and the Arts is hard to understand until one meets his mentor. For emotions are so much in us that they are the hardest to overcome. Truest justice with Arts and Reason cannot happen without an elaborate view from the Ethical standpoint. Ethics-- a peak which is far above the Morality peak which most human dont even strive to achieve. Ethics don't judge actions to be good or bad. For Ethics are the consequence of Action. Ethics look for Intentions. Intentions which are then the outcome of the greatest gift to humans - the emotions. The whole round journey from Emotion-less-ness (Nirmoh, or Objectivism) to back to Emotional self.
It is upto this point that highest of peaks can a person climb, while on surface, he is busy doing the mundane works of life.
He was the Brahman on which depended my beliefs.
Sunday, April 17, 2011
Re-searching Varanasi in my voyage
1) Microsoft Encarta described Varanasi as one of the oldest surviving cities on Earth today. Its history is claimed to be over 3000years old. Also, it was City, not a village or Just another human settlements. Jericoh , in Israel , is the oldest Village.
2) Lord Shiva, one of chief gods of Hindu mythology, is said to have chosen Varanasi for his final settlement after his marriage with Parvati.
In equivalent terms, the story sounded to me like - a software engineer chosing to settle in Noida, or Newyork after doing lots of on-sites in many parts of the world. We know on what all basis a man decides all this. More, when he has married a rich beautiful girl for his wife, who comes from, say Uttranchal. :-D. The best and finest cities possible. That was Varanasi for a choice in those times of Lord Shiva.
3) Varanasi flourished as centre for arts ( there are two schools of Kathak dance as per Indian beliefs, Benares and Jaipur), Spirituality ( centre for religion, many of the oldest scriptures are suppose to have been written here, Tulsidas's Ramayan being one most recent ones among many) . Chandrakant Santati by Deviki nandan Khatri has its plot revolving around the fort of Ramnagar,and Chunar. Kabir was from this city.
4) Varanasi was a centre for accomplishments in art related fields. Bismillah Khan- the shehnai player is from Varanasi.
5) it was the centre for researches into philosophical matters. Lord buddha gave his first sermon at Sarnath in Varanasi. Buddhism and its philosophy are today treated as the first truest contribution to the field of some practical philosophy by Hindu religion. Buddha taught about the Middle path, and how to live a peaceful happy life. His language was of the common people.
Before him, most of the philosophical contributions by Vedic religion were slowly turned into story of some mystical gods, like Ramayan and Mahabharata, which the traders on the famous Silk Route did not take much interest in. That might help understand how Buddhism became popular in China, Korea and Japan in comparison with Vedic Dharma. Vedas and Bhagwad Gita did not make as strong impact outside Indian land as did Buddhism. Although Buddha's teaching can be said to be influentially borrowed from Vedas only. Maybe language barrier was the cause.
6) Buddhism, later, some 2500 years later, is supposedly the influencing source for Christ's religion. In this sense Vedas can be said to be out-source point for many different religions.
7) Iran's original religion is supposedly a very close sister religion of the Vedic Dharma. A fact, which brings the archeologists to claim that Aryans migrated in two groups- one settled in iran and the other in northern India.
8) Philosophy continued to be the 'main thought' of dwellers of Ganges Basin. Perhaps so much so that the Maharashtrians today say that Biharis and Bhaiya have a tremendous 'Convincing Power'. Nevertheless, the shastrarth, a formal debate on Vedic knowledge and interpretations, became a forte of Varanasi dwellers. An annual round of debate is suppose to happen , organised by Maharaja Benares, between the six groups of Brahmins. Since the Maithali Brahmins have won it maximum number of times, they are suppose to be most intelligents of all sects of Brahmins ( refer Wikipedia search on topic Brahmins).
9) Benares generally host the Pandey, Mishra ,vajpayee, Dubey, Pathaks, Tripathi, Shukla , Dwivedi , Chaturvedi clubs of Brahmins. A Brahmin, by Vedic technicality is NOT a caste, but a concept which helps one know the consequences of action (Karma) later in time. In equivalent terms, it is the combined form of Rule 2 (responsibility) and Rule 6(safe speed) along with general Prudence , of the Colregs 1972. the british and the muslim invaders mis-interpreted Brahmanism, giving Brahmins also as a caste-form. Otherwise, it is but a philosophical research. Researcher from any caste would become a Brahmin ones his research was over. That also explains the reasons for these surnames among the Brahmins which is actually the Upadhi ( a status title) earned by them. Shastri is one more such title. Benares was one centre for these jobs.
A pandit , or a temple priest is different from a Brahmin, although essentially seen as one and same, by way of inter-marriages. Thus many other clubs, such as Vajpayee, Pandey, Shukla are only priest, taken as Brahmin, for knowledge on how to conduct a prayer ceremony.
10) Philosophy later attached with the Benares Hindu University became very popular study in the city. Dr S Radhakrishnan, the first Vice President, himself a 'Doctor of Philosophy in Philsosophy' was the vice chancellor of BHU from where he took over as the vice-president. His birthday is marked as Teachers Day in India.
11) B.K Matilal, another product from BHU, is the most read authors of study books on Indian Philosophy. His Nayay thesis( justice, -method of proving an argument) is supposedly the closest resemblance work of Indian Philosophy to the Aristotlean theories on the same topic. He is known for many other achievements.
12) Benares has got three different universities: BHU, sanskrit vidyapeeth, and one more( refer Wikipedia).
13) Pan chewing (beetle leaves) is a typical cultural habit of Varanasi dwellers. In this intense atmosphere of spiritual Philsosophy and debates, I can notice thyroid related problem to be immense. These problems are mostly of origin from emotional stresses one undergoes in this kind of atmosphere. Pan leaves with Chuna (lime) and tobacco maybe one of the locally found neutralizer for the bile juices produced from liver in higher stress conditions. Thyroid is the chief triggering hormones for such work. Thyroid in itself is impacted by Pitutatry Gland, which is master gland located in the brain. Ones thinking-center is located there too. Thus emotional stress show up as body disorders.
thyroid - hypo or hyper, shows up as losing hair, bulgy eyes, crumbled legs, weak bones, low energy level, high climate temperature intolerance, kidney or liver problem, calcium imbalances in bones, etc.
I noticed these problems in many life forms , including humans, cows, dogs.
Sports and Athletics maybe the most distant choice for Varanasi dwellers. Politics is naturally the closest.