passing thought

I was watching this ad on TV, "Atithi devo bhav". What occured to my mind was how the public would be reacting to such moral science ads or talks .
"Atithi ke liye hi sab khulla rakha hai jaise".
" Jaise sirf ussi se humari dukaan chal rahi hai".
"aur woh jo humme do sau saal loot kar gaye hai, mehmaan bann kar aaye them uska kuch nahin".

what not would public think.

Often such moral science teaching produce a negative reaction and lead more in the negativity than how much existed before. We tend to respond negative to positive thoughts.
Intimacy is something, about which although there exist a public knowledge but it still requires some privacy. One can imagin what example i would count in that. (i.e, everyone knows what one does his/her spouse; that's Intimacy. What all one actually does with the doors locked, as in toilet or bedroom is Privacy; and what one hides from others for some kinds of gains or advanctage is Secrecy).
Secrecy is something which is not known to the public, athough it may or may-not be necessary to be a public knowledge.
'Atithi devo bhav' was more of an 'Intimate' public knowledge until some untowards happened. Breach of intimacy through making of this Ad may be leading to negative reactions from the public, perhaps.

Niceties and Nuances

Niceties and Nuances

Ever wondered how the linguistics has a got a relation with a person's growth and development.
Even as i use many a similiar meaning words in the sentance above and as a title for my blog, I think to myself if the subtle difference in their meanings can bring all that difference in the world around myself.
Well, it does.
I recall that tuition class of Mr Ashok Gupta, my maths teacher during the IIT preparatory years, who once wrote down some equation and while elaborating on it's meaning, went on to say the Pride and Confidence have a very fine difference:- that of Hardwork.
What this recall did tell me was that , for both, Pride and for Confidence, there is just one word in Hindi language:- Garv. 'Ghamand' is a latter day corruption of the concept, which, still, fails to explain us, the students, how one is different from another.
Look at the list below and let's see if we know how to differ between the two:-

1. Morality, Ethics and Religion:- Hindi language keeps mostly one word to talk of all three: 'Dharma'
2. Pride, Confidence and Overconfidence:- Garv , in hindi
3. Faith, Belief and Confidence:- Vishwas, in Hindi
4. Growth and Development:- Vikas , in hindi
5. Niceties and Nuances :- Bareeki, in hindi/ Urdu
6. Safety and Security:- Surakhsha , in Hindi
7. Rules and Regulations :- Niyam , in hindi. Often used with Kanoon too, which is Urdu perhaps but definitely not Hindi. In any case, can any one differ out the two??
8. Concept and Understanding:- Samajh, in Hindi/Urdu
9. Brain and Mind:- Buddhi , in Hindi
10. Intimacy and Secrecy : Gaupniya, in Hindi

There are many more. Add to the list if someone remembers something like it.

Model of business around transportation by sea

Business and laws


Business model of Sea Transport



When I look at the above diagram, I tend to wonder how small is the position of every person in the whole circle of business.
The bold yellow highlighter indicates us, the sea farers, and our ship. the red denotes the Cargo, whole purpose of a merchant ship and seafarer's existence.
The Bold Green reversible arrow line indicates 'Trade'.
What's trade? I wonder in a real philosophical sense. The very meaning of existence of human beings. The crunch of our society and all our relations.
Oh ho ho. It's only trade-by-sea that serves the seafarer's purpose, but that doesn't mean that 'only' that all is Trade. Trade in its more diverse forms is everywhere. That is why I say, Trade is in all human exchanges..
And then , as the great Kautilya puts it, in Arthshastra, "There can be no human relation without self-interest." It's trade.
And then look at all those laws that apply to that small entity of this big cris-cross world, the contractual laws, and all that in the list, lower down.
How will that common man, as a sea-farer, live all those laws?? So much of it.
Dharma becomes his only shelter to live life with peace.To live awakened, knowledge-gaining, quiet, and recluse. ...Never know what law may slay him down when.
So much powerless and so much beseiged by compilations of law, we are, we all.
Some of them for our safety only, but still crushing us down with their weight for their good application. That's the irony.
And then I think of Arjun in the battlefield. Dharma and bhagvad make more sense now than before.
To deliver the idealism of Ram in this huge, complex world of business is what is the pragmatism of Krishna, the lesson of Dharma.

why sea stabilisation for collision avoidance

radar beam1

Now some adevrtisement time.!

Digeus Registry Cleaner Application

So, time to try somethings new in life.
this website.
and the new AdSense gadget...


The above link is for an application which offers easy-to-use optimization tools to speed up and improve the stability of your Windows 7, Windows Vista, or Windows XP PC.
It includes essential tools to fix Windows security loopholes. Permanently erase your Internet activity, personal files, and free space to keep your information away from prying eyes.

Have fun, friends,
And Happy new year.

A ten-years night in the museum

Hail ho! i have woken up. At least that’s what i feel about it today. Where was i? What was i doing? Where have i come from? What do i want? What is it that is destined for me? I guess i have started to get some little idea. The deep sleep has given me enough dreams to see and feel what not many people in my surrounding have known never in their life. Yes they all know it exist. But not so personal and as real as i have.
The social and economic history of india has paraded before my eyes. The cultural errors of our nation opened up so blatant. I have rebelled against everything, but with a smile on my face, and sometimes tears in my heart. I have been hailed, applauded, scathed all at the same time by different sets of people. I have been judged, argued, praised, humiliated – everything by many different people. I have survived this all because there remains only one thing that hold me to the place where i am..my belief in myself, and that i know myself, my knowledge, my intimate awareness of something so much otherwise known, my potentials, my past records.
I have done this, and i know i will do this again. To fight and to win this. the system, which is so much natural to human kind for its existence, then to feel the shortcomings and defects of it, and then to re-invent it for the contemporary times. It’s not about blaming it anymore. It’s about re inventing it this time. But think..where will the blame go.?? To the one who will strive to re invent it. Isn’t ?
Never mind, take the poison cauldron , but make life better for the future generation to live. Sacrifice is a demand of nature to see the change happen to your needs.
SCI has ships too old and outdated that i never knew where will i arrive after so many years of service with them. And then when i switch over (to foreign companies), i feel as though it is a new life, and seafaring is just come to me, like for a cadet!
But even here i have not yet got my peace of mind that i have been actually searching for—the perfect system towards which the policy-makers point us to , somewhere too distant and too hazy to even feel. i have to give myself time to feel whether it exist or not. The feed backs don’t support it ‘s existence. People actually are a cause for their own misery. They cannot be trusted as much. They live by opportunity principle. They live for themselves. Cannot blame them or criticise them. All i can do and demand is -- not to get a blame on myself, for whatever disturbances i have created or will be creating in the system, to reinvent it. Someday someone had to do this for the change. Perchance its me today. Fate has brought me to do it. Can’t help, if that be the destiny of things.
The period of rest- as a legislative need for STCW compliance, and the Economics study into labour consumption is not much in the theme as yet. Honest and truthful data will be required. But one will cross the other, to upset the veracity of the data. Many seafarers will not want their salaries to be lowered to support the increased total crew on board so that the period-of-rest requirements could be met to letter and spirit.
Human intervention will have to be bypassed for an accurate data collection, therefore.
The inter-personal relationship will have to be re defined . is it master who is all responsible.?/
Then how will he ensure a truthful representation of period of rest versus compliance with STCW period of rest- versus vessel’s other commercial necessities.
It going to be tough, unless the authorities make intervention to bypass the human involvement in collection of this data.
The name of the ships are after the PVC winners of our country. Who gave these ships these names?! Then, the machinery and equipment at some places are extremely flabbergasting and sometimes most nonsensical to be there at all. For example, the 10 pumps we had in our pump room, --feels like a luxury, were actually a result of short thinking by the company managers of those days. Seems like they went by ‘reputation and image building’ , pompous acts to have selected such a design. There were 4 eductors as well. Then, 3 ladder on each side , port and starboard, --ever heard or seen such a luxury. The four life boats! All such flabbergasted. Who the hell thought to buy them for business or for showmanship , or to make money for himself through some underhand commission?! History holds that during the purchase of these vessels, the then naval chief was also an ex-officio head of SCI, which is why these names and such unusual designs. And there is not just one such species..there are fourteen of them, and made by none other than Hyundai!

On cigarette smoking and drinking

Reference the link below:
http://sjmayank.blogspot.com/2009/12/shameless-smokers.html

By Mayank dealing with ciggarette smoking and drinking - ethical approach on doing it in a given place, with given group of people, et al



"Be a rebel". I will begin my comment with this famous line in one famous song from 'rang de basanti'.
I am a smoker and a drinker too. But Ii come from same cultural set-up as yours-- Lucknow and Varanasi combination, and know that we are discouraged to try them ever. i was and I am as sincere in my thoughts as your surely are(or maybe little less than you) but sometime i decided to practice one old moral science lesson : don't criticize the apples from China before you have tasted them.
Now being of a scientific thinking background, Mayank, tell me:
a) what is so good in smoking and drinking that makes it a habit-forming?
b) How much of book-read knowledge you have on these habits? Delirium? Deliquescent?
c) Legal aspects on public smoking? Ethical approach on what can be imposed on person which he choices not to -- like the choice of a non-smoker of not smoking in a given place, to be imposed on a smoker person?
d) What's smoking in essence and how deeply it is known to cause troubles? and how serious?
e) and how many other such causes are known and what has been done about them?!?

To give my answers:
a)Dopamine effect (a psychological phenomenon) is triggered. tell your ignorant friends that this psychological need is as good as craving to have water, or food, or sex, when thirsty, hungry or horny. Mechanical Engg boys, u all, have short visions on all other subjects, and with that mind do you dream to do good to your country?! Wake up and keep all round knowledge. (sorry for being little harsh._)

b)Mild smoking and drinking do NOT make you habitual. I consume these in good count, but as i write these the last cigarette i smoked was on 28th Feb and the last drink i had was in first week of Feb'10 !! Delirium is mild happiness, one stage of drinking, Alcoholism is one stage which most you ignorant people identify drinking habit with, in which the person becomes violent or so compulsive that he beats up his wife and leaves his small children hungry to buy himself alcohol.
Mild drinking is known to be good to health and esp heart. There is hardly any ban on drinking in any developed, wisdom-filled society. Read more books and matter to be a good person and a judge/decision-maker later in ur professional life.

c)In Europe, smoking is banned in all public places and people actually follow it, although it doesn’t mean that smoking is discouraged over there.! they all still smoke , perhaps same as before, albeit on open roads. And those same smokers will deny you smoking permission when u would do them in public place! Are you getting the ethics of what can be imposed on a person which is distinctly a matter of personal choice, not strictly resolved by law.?! Mayank, this is very important philosophy which will lead you to Objectivism, aka Nirmoh (in Bhagvad Geeta) and make you a good decision-maker for the corporate.

d)Smoking is a personal pleasure or maybe a need. U cannot deny this to a person who needs it. It is statistically known to cause cancer, but so do the smoke from your bike or your car ! And many smokers are still known to live for over 100 years, or suitably long enough by some self-chosen, or statistically obtained average age!

e) We are acting too strict against smoking or drinking due to temperance or religion-driven zeal, very likely. Think.
In Europe all chemical substances are being discouraged from personal use as they are known to be the real cause for body trouble. So people are switching over from cigarettes to Biddis ( !!!) as biddis are chemical-free and naturals ! nice, na.?

Have fun and enjoy. :-)

daily log

17th Aug
Met my old , high school teacher, Mrs Sharma, today at Universal Book Shop , Gomti Nagar. [:)]

Have a secret in your life.~~!

Have a secret in life.

Keeping a secret teaches one to practice some self control. Then it teaches about how to keep trust and intimacy with someone you share your secret with.
Have a secret.
;-)

:-)

The merchant navy academics--- an import-export of management lessons.

The merchant navy academics--- an import-export of administrative-management lessons.

Transfer of newly researched knowledge on various aspects of managements, like administrative decision-making which effectively conform to the principles of democracy, the methods of achieving transparency in governance by way of making the reports reach to public, methods and specific places of implementing measures to achieve human safety, the methods of effecting controls, particularly regarding those for security in the heightened terrorism environment, severely balancing it with the freedom of movement to people and the flow of trade- these are some very absorbing topics we come across when undergoing academics for merchant naval courses.
Ever pondered as an untrained member of public about how would you carry out investigations into any accidents happening around yourself!? Never mind. If not about the criminal investigation into murder cases which require forensic work and the police, we are still given lessons on investigations of administrative nature into those involving merchant ships. It is really good to know that whatever may be the political system of the member countries of the United Nations, the UN itself works on the principles of democracy. And which it had to for the obvious reasons of fulfilling the objectives of all member states.
And still more interesting is to know that the democratic functioning and public attitudes at that highest level of congregation of world governments is not much different from what we see here in India- Indian parliament and state assemblies! Just that no hand fights have picked up in General Assembly of the UN. But the UN think-tanks do take into account the ‘practical’ or ‘the other’ conditions which the member states would be considering for ratifying or rejecting any legislation passed by it. Hence, smart enough, they designed the method of Tacit Acceptance, for ratification of laws in which the law is deemed to have been passed after the specified time period, unless the member states do not submit, in writing, exactly how and why would they object to its passing, within that stipulated period.! Smart , na.
Then, the think-tanks, being democratic, also understood the technical and intellectual contrast of the member states which might come in way of passing a law. Hence, they re-defined the concept of ‘majority’ for passing of each bill. In general, in our shipping field, the majority is usually considered as ‘specified number of member states, having a specified percentage of total world’s fleet’. Therefore, the democracy in the UN simply does not rest on the first-by-post, ( the majority of numbers concept) - something much different from our Indian philosophy. We have largely depended on the weight of numbers, not giving much importance to how much weight-age the number-makers should individually get.
Then, the laws formation generally begins from the birth stage called as the ‘Conventions’ , which literally translates as-- a belief. Thus, everything begins with the belief of human beings in-principle in something. The Convention specifically writes down that the assembly( of the UN or IMO) ( to answer to the question of who all member states), recalling (to the question of why of the rising of belief among the member states), considering ( to the question of what are the fundamental beliefs of the member states), having considered (to the question of any specific incident or any practical scenario causing it) , agree ,( proceed on to mention the broad term approach of doing what all to rectify the problem).
Conventions and resolutions are further composed of various morality and ethics (the M&E) principles, called the Articles, to be adhered to in achieving the objectives.
The further specific problems arising in achieving the ends of a Convention are resolved through forming a Resolution about it. The technical and technological work essential to achieving is organized by the expert committees.
Therefore we have things like the IMO’s “International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from ships, 1973”
With lots of resolutions taking place under it. And the two expert committees called the Marine Environment Protection committee (the MEPC) and the Maritime Safety Committee (the MSC). The law enacted through this convention came to be known as the MARPOL 73/78 (acronym for Marine Pollution). In books, the compilation of Regulations is presented as an Annex to the Convention and special factions of the Regulations are put as a Code. The amendments to any convention are carried out through a different protocol, known as the protocol, and having different criteria for the majority-clearing. The protocols and conventions can have Amendments only by way of Explicit Acceptance,(method opposite to Tacit Acceptance). The expert committee works are relatively easier for acceptance or rejection by the member states, through the Tacit Acceptance procedure.
The broadest umbrella convention that gives cover/the impetus to all works in the maritime affairs is known as the International Convention for Safety of Life at sea, popularly known as the SOLAS convention, which brought about a legislation of the same name.
The MARPOL convention has virtually trained guns on all thinkable sources of pollution , anywhere -on land or at sea. However, it is meant to be applied on ships and sea-related incidents only. Therefore, crude oil (from cargo and bunkers of ships), air (from the funnels of ships), ballast (from the ballast water), anti-fouling (from the paint work on the walls of ships), vibration (from the infrasonic vibrations produced by propellers of merchant ships, bad for the endangered marine species), noise ( from noise produced by ships machinery), noxious liquid ( noxious cargo of ships).-- everything is covered.
These laws specifically zoom down on methods of achieving the control- which begins at the design criteria of the ship, specifically mentioning, in intriguing details, the kinds of designs permitted, the quality, the measurements, of each design, specifically for the construction of ships. Very surprising is to feel that, despite being so specific, these details still make endeavors not to chain down human creativity so long as the purpose is met. Therefore, in theory, the novel designs of at least the same standards are allowed to take shape of reality after special considerations. These details are all are given by the expert committees, the members (engineers, architects, research scientists, etc) of which are surely coming from high placed technical universities the world over, and as a matter of fact mostly in the US, Canada, Europe and Japan. (developing nations have lesser know-how on the technological work, don’t we?)
The IMO is well aware that the purposes cannot be met unless the member states are really inclined towards that. Hence, we have things like the Port State Control, in which the host country for any trading merchant vessel has the right to carry out inspections of the ships for the compliance of rules, although the prime responsibility of which rest with the flag state of the ship. Imagine what happens when an Indian Ship visit’s the US?! Guessed right, if you are not a jingoist and if you are honest and truthful to yourself, our ships conditions have graduated to the grey list from black-list of the US port state, the ‘port state’ over there being constituted of the US Coast Guard. !!.
The IMO is also aware that such inspections may also become tool for a prejudicial actions towards other countries- say on the basis of colour, religion, mutual hostilities. And inferior ships may put claims of such discriminations to save themselves when caught by any other nation. So the IMO has taken measures; -- guesses? It allows port-states to do more rigorous inspections on ships, which have been found to be sub-standard despite all such claims of discriminations, and the IMO specifically lays down conditions and procedures as to how a ship can be held-back (‘arrested’) -- keeping a fine balance between the business profitability of ship and it’s due compliance with the safety and environment laws. The prejudicial actions have been striven to be resolved by laying more objective and comprehensive conditions of detention of ships.
Return home. As these methods of working of the UN are spanning wings, the Indian participants-- the Indian Foreign Services delegates, the IAS representatives, the shipping professionals, the civil-aviation professionals, and many more of us are taking lessons to implement them back at home too for achieving the domestic social targets. Many amendments and changes in the our civil governance, the change in approach and outlook of our high ranking bureaucrats, I can sense, has undertones of interactions with such international legislations.
In our Ship Master’s course, we read about the Merchant shipping Act (the MSA)(1958, India Government) as the principle topics for management of ships, and understanding the affairs of the government offices or any governments of any country in the world towards the merchant ships, taking our very India’s policy work as the example. Most other democratic government will have more or less the same approach. The policies in regard to disciplinary measures, official log-book, reporting to authorities of flag state, appointments of authorities like the surveyors, receivers of wreck, salvaging operations at sea, employment of sea-farers, etc are more or less same as prescribed by our MSA. Now obviously because, our product is actually a work of the original the English Common Law, and then later ‘inspired’/affected/amended/homogenized-by various International Conventions, which affect likewise to all member states of the UN.
The mercantile laws which govern the carriage of cargo, keeping the balance between the responsibilities and liabilities of both, the shipper and the carrier, are also formulated by International bodies, like the BIMCO, the UNCTAD (the UN Conference on trade and development), etc. The Hague-Visby rules, the York-Antwerp rules, etc can thus be seen as the source of inspiration of our domestic legislations also, in regard to consumer protection.
I can feel the deep chasm between our domestic legal approach with and without these international rules. It seems that the ruling of the judicial courts also is taking influences as the expert advisors of the courts are getting more and more trained in these regulations. The changes, without the global experience, would be sluggish to come about. In bigger words, I feel that our people were, and still, lacking in the management lessons to achieve the same social welfare agenda which we all have otherwise resolved to achieve. The occasional fumbling of our local legislatures, state and central, in the law-making or its execution, keeps reminding me what we originally were as the best intellects of Indian society with the global experience. The various draconian Panchayati decrees gives back to us nothing but our own ground Intellectualism without the exposure of the world class.
Guess what the Hague-Visby Rules say about how to interpret a legislation.? The numbered-rules are to be given preference over the lettered-rules! What does it mean? Actually, the HV Rules regarding the duties and liabilities of shipper and the carrier, are composed of the Institute Clauses formed by the Lloyds of London. Institute clause have three parts-- clause-paramount, letter-rules and numbered-rules. Numbered-rules are but a simplified interpretations of the lettered- rules. So, the rules of Hague-Visby say that the executives need not do the hard work of interpreting the rules again and therefore they should blindly follow numbered-ruled preferentially over the lettered-rules.
Now, try thinking how would you interpret the MSA.? The guidelines obtained through various court verdicts and proper studies on this matter also give same approach as the Hague-Visby rules! Funny, na? But, the literal translation of the legislation is to be preferred over the attempts of trying to judge the intentions of the legislatures when he was formulating the law. Thus, the debates in the parliaments during the making of law should not be considered in interpreting the laws! And it’s good because the courts agree that various ‘other’ considerations are taken by the legislatures to vote for or against the making of a law! It’s practically the same everywhere in the world.
Besides these, the mercantile procedures, Safety conscientiousness is another place where the interfacing with global mandates has upped our outlook. Shipping had an IMO mandated requirement for the GPS position fixing from year1992 itself. the deployment of fire extinguishers, provisions of emergency escape in a mobile unit, the entire disaster management thoughts are much later pullulates from such shipping and civil aviation regulations only.
come to think of the Mumbai attacks, it reminds me that many more such attacks could be thwarted only because of international regulations like ISPS, which are striving to involve professionals like mariners to take charge of their respective fields. Thousands of container cargoes would become more difficult for rummaging by the customs, without our participation. Our global transience brings to us an awakening to security lessons of high standards.
Salvage, wreck handling, marine insurance, global logistics, supply chain of oil and gasoline, chartering and brokering of ship, stowaways, customs, immigration, are few topics we have some mild strokes of. Medical aid, seeking port of refuge, handling phenomena of weather on vast oceans-ice, storms, fog, horologic, is what we deal in regularly.
The principles on documenting and record-keeping learnt and practiced by us through the ISM code tell about the current out reach and severity in it. Compared against the cases like Nithari case and many more, the lapses involved like the elusive FIR by police expose the time lag between what we have already gained and what India has yet to achieve at the mass level.

Stresses make their way

Stresses make their way
For past some days I have been trying to recapitulate how Stresses ride in and on a modern man. There is one thing I am beginning to get sure of: that stresses are communicable problem. A stressed up man in proximity is potent vector to bring about stresses in every one around; he can stress up the whole contiguous environment.
Stresses have become so much a part of our life that perhaps we have stopped seeing many of its harmful forms as a problem itself. Like, the examination stress. Students these days are thin, lean people. Do we ever think how the food intake for a normal healthy growth gets reduced in them?

Many lives that we live
Then, more importantly, I can see this dual or multiple lives phenomenon getting large with many of us. I myself feel a different man when working as an officer on ship, a different man when in my friends group, and a different man-- better say a child-- when fighting with my parents; and yet a different man when going to my pertinent offices.
And I live all these lives quite successfully for a considerably long time, not letting one life know about the other lives. That’s become so common with many people around us. The modern man’s life has got too much demanding on him that an evolution has come about to yield all the types from one single soul. Our physical appearances, our voices, our dressing sense, our demeanor changes as a whole while we are hopping from one life to other.
In this movie, ‘The Invasion’ (starring Daniel Craig, Nicole Kidman), I noted one talk from Kidman, her character being that of a psychologist, that we the modern human beings shall in another 2~3 hundred not be the same species that have been in the past 5000 years. Our psychology, our outlook, our life style is changing so fast. Our immense thirst and search for knowledge in some 50-6 years has begun to lead us towards some major evolutionary change. The physique is beginning to change, in first place. Our extremes are polarizing more frequently than before. For example, the physical fitness of those related with sports and so is turning to be much better than those in the brain-jobs. The Air-con workers are becoming more fragile, sensitive, but even more brainier than field workers.
Cant guess what I will be emotionally like many years hence, when I turn back to read this blog of mine.

“What I think”….
on pouch belly:-
Our body fat has got to sediment at some place in our body. the genetic make-up usually determines that-the stomach for we Indians. Supposing we lash up the belly, to force the fat to the upper torso. Then also the chest will start to bulge out.
The most healthy trick to check a pouch belly is to push the body fat to the dorsal side of chest. This way the lungs which need space to grow up to bring accommodate a larger size to run the big body’s need will also be served right.
Therefore, pull-up exercise is the best, if you want to reduce the tummy.

on Astrology:-
sometimes i've felt intense boredom, emptiness, workless-ness in myself. it's usually after a deep sleep. it feels as though mind has lost direction. the sense of time is upset. I lose out my location.
Why is this so?
Having worked in the precincts of a mechanical device Gyro compass, here is something that occurred me. Otherwise also, this type of thought is very common to occur to a nautical astronomer, maybe giving hints how the science of astronomy could have drifted away into the art of astrology, back in the history.
The word ‘lunatic’ has, in the past, been derived and used - to describe a man’s mental health as affected by movement of the ‘luna’ -the moon.
The training of mind is something a common experience for any hard-practiced achiever - be it academics or sports , or anything else. The word ‘focus’, ‘concentration’. etc have been used to describe some property to mind.
I think, much like how our body has got it’s own ‘body clock’ to regulate various body operations, we also have a kind of a ‘gyro’ compass to help the mind work in a certain streamlined manner. However, this body compass is also subject to ‘wobbling’ , like how it happens in case of the failure of gyro compass. This compass is direction-ed or aligned towards a given star depending on various factors, a strong influential factor in which could be the position of the biggest celestial body around us, which exerts the strongest gravitation pull on our body fluids-- the sun.
The solar pull gives a certain direction to our body compass, depending on what time of the year we were born. That is how our zodiac sign finds it’s birth. The constellation in which the sun lies at the time of birth , gives us our zodiac sign.
This assignment, further by making some due observation, gives the astrology-observers, experiential knowledge of how the person of certain zodiac sign is expected to run his thoughts. Basis this, it is possible to give a very rough and broad-term predictions of his future or behaviour, and advise him of his own conduct in the given time of the year.
This kind of prediction, obviously, had lots of limitations , but in some sense can be taken to be well-advanced with respect to olden times, and kind of a baby step to form more accurate attempts at predicting one’s future.
A hard time-taking training of mind can be done to align it any other direction, to bend the flow of thoughts in any other chosen direction.
The above argument deeply hinge on the presence of this gyro of our mind, proving or disproving which can help on further researches on this line of thought.
PS: the above is strictly a copyright-able work of this author. Nobody, particularly the hindu-religious fanatics, is (not) allowed to steal it in any form, to give it in his/their work of any form. :-) . I assume they would be the first kind of people to cash on such absurd imagino-scientific works.

Movie Review: Aamir

Movie Review: AAMIR
If I were to prepare my list of best bollywood produces for the year that has just been, I guess ‘Aamir’ would be the one to which I would give full credits. A touchy, more socially, politically, sectary matured story giving a deeper and broader message that any other flick. I can sense “a Wednesday” is making bigger raves than this, (in fact Aamir has not even won nominations this year among the popular movies) , but the critic and social thinker should uphold ‘Aamir’ no where inferior to any other.
Rajeev Khandelwal’s Muslim character, eye-cocking smile, chasing around the suburbs and shanties of Mumbai make up for the back ground of a common man, superficially of a Muslim religion, but in depth, of any random citizen who can rather not be identified of his religion by his ordinary routines.
‘A Wednesday’ describes the frustration of a common man, portrayed by a real-life muslim, Nasser-ud-din Shah, who revenges upon his neglect by both, the authorities and the terrorists. The main character, who refuses to divulge his name to lend a stronger impact in his message, is shown to be an aged man, who is other wise working at the instructions of his wife, to help her support and nurture the family, much like we all do.
In comparison, “Aamir” describes a young man, happily occupied in his day to work, having a girlfriend, (in fact one from outside his sect - a hindu), and as though unaware of the predicaments of our politico-bureaucratic on-goings( the chief components of ’System’). He is suffering from asthma; he is god- fearing nevertheless; he is caring for his mother and rest of his family, much like us and also like those terrorist who schematically attempt to rope him in there religious-zealot activity. Throughout the movie, Aamir runs pillar to post, just like most of us would agree to do if suddenly caught unprepared to take speeches and provocation of that kind,( and join in to do what Aamir goes around doing), un-thinking. But his happy background, his last minute self-realisation, his acknowledgment of all the gifts that he has received from the society despite all neglects and failures that have also come along, make him a true AAMIR : the leader of the people.
Perhaps this kind of context would have been more befitting to describe person like, say, Ajmal Aamir Kasab, who failed to become a true Amir, only for failing to make his last-moment decision.
Anger and frustrations are perhaps the jewel of youth years. Youth has always been identified with this. Youth is a ‘system-basher’ , a ‘system-fighter‘ , an ‘anti-system’ gun. That is why, he is also easy to be trapped by the other cold-blooded planners to execute their vicious plans.
Aamir is a story of one such person, but who chooses to wake himself up, to make a bigger voluntary self-sacrifice, sending a chill down the spines of every one, making a more deep impact on the psychology of his mentors and the audiences of the movie.
System-bashing is agreed as a natural act, but should not result into damaging the life of other people very finely threaded with the system.

The other flicks I saw and liked are: Welcome to Sajjanpur, Dasvidaniyan, a Wednesday

The joke dates back to time when were doing Pre-sea at MTI in 1998. There was one Captain K Gupta, our course-cod, who was very supercilious , condescending, torturous to us.
But he was never able to pronounce Ankit’s surname correctly. He called him, “Ga-ra-g”. Conscientious of this, once he attempted to pre-empt his ridiculing from us saying that, “you people must be laughing, na?”
Shy and sincere, we immediately negated his charge, saying “no sir, we don’t”.
The captain struck back, also affirming his old claim, “Then you people are idiots”. !!!

Nice song: Sabka Katega by Bodhi Tree.

War or no war?

War or no war ?

This one to address something most impending on each of us, even though I remain no accredited expert to deliver on it. My mind is a free world where any thing can click, and here is on such uncommon calculations:
The 26/11 Mumbai carnage has brought us to an unprecedented position with our western neighbours. What routes further from here? When reading about the event, minute by minute, on the Times of India news site , accessing the internet using a USB doggle from China, I was feeling the pain within. Perhaps every one of us , all Indians-- Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs-- each one of us must have questioned to himself if we were meant to die away suddenly by an unknown, un-understood bullet, or a bomb blast, while dinning in a posh hotel, or taking a tough journey in a train? What will be the purpose of our life? To suddenly die away?
And this bastard-y act from Pakistani soil has put every single mind under a mountain of self-doubts. Yes, that would contain Indian Muslims as well, whose allegiance to this nation has always been subjected to scrutiny by all non-Muslims, even myself, until the Mumbai carnage. Mumbai doesn’t settle the dust from their allegiance issue, but perhaps leaves them with no option but to side with the country they were born on, even if they didn’t like the cricket match victories of it. The ‘unknown’ bullets and the bombs have its targets quite as much unknown to itself; - it could be any --Muslims and non-Muslims - alike.
The 26/11 sent a message across to them too, that they are as much subject to the fear as the rest of us. Same fate and same Hoors or Angels wait for the non-Muslims in the Jannat or Heaven above as for the Muslims, even if the Indian Muslims are indirectly and silently intending to support the Jehad , if they are welcoming a self-sacrifice for the cause of Islam. Even Indian Muslims have families, and as much deep-rooted in the soil of this nation as the rest of us.
The question then reduces to that of life and death for all of us, A decision has to be made-- whether to break the 5000years of our history of never attacking a country, or, an as much old history of taking attacks from the outsiders. Changing times induces us to change the history from here on. It is a post independence India, taking steps for a self-improvement and struggling to make a good relations with its neighbours, unless the neighbours have some hidden agenda, like the victory of Islam, for themselves.
China is also slowly waking up to understand the inherent desires of us, even as the agendas of Pakistan become visible to the whole world. A nation created after a fragmenting of this continent, has no other purpose but to win us over, and then the whole world.
The US is as much in bad shoes as us. It may rather be seeing us coming in the same bad shoes as they already were in. The whole world criticized them, and Mr Bush, for his invasion of Iraq. This carnage leading to Indian assalut would give them a good partner to stand-by to face the bombarding questions from the whole world. The two could explain it better to the world, why they did what they did. Further it would ease the pressure, the workload in particular, from the cleansing job they are on, in Iraq and Afghan. The assault will leave us, Indians, less choice post the attack, but to become one with the US. And that is a cost much less to ask of us today, than the huge collateral damage we are taking otherwise. Repeated incursions in Pakistan by the US drone planes would not yield as much result as one single full-scale assault by the Indians.
The other Gulf states, despite sharing the common religion with Pakistan, are themselves undergoing some sort of democracy-kind of social-welfare awakening as the oil is weeding out or evaporating from their soil. The new world order, of Globalization and multi-nationalism, has taught them to start pushing the religion behind, into a closet and accept the advance of Indian Keralites with an open arm. They minght not be taken by the fact that Pakistan is Muslim state too, while the king of Saudi-Arabia takes some measures to establish the sincerity of Muslims people and Islamic religion to the whole big world staring suspicion at them. Maybe they would sense that Pakistan, now, is the one bringing a bad name to them, when India remains the home of one of the largest population count of the Muslims. SRK, Salman, Aamir, and many more belong to this country.
Pakistan seems to be cornering itself into an unperceived isolation by assuming more arrogance and denials to apparently us, but deep within, to the whole world. To the world, it is now becoming a common Bollywood story of two brothers, born of same mother, and who arrive a different fate some 60 years hence. Something like the movie ‘Race’.
In case of war, Pakistan, which is at present looking up to its nuclear arsenal will have lesser free-will to use, as many Indian Muslims over here stand along and wait for what there western brothers have kept in store for them for all the direct and indirect allegiance they had paid to the former. Nuclear bomb is an end device, meant to kill Muslims as much as the Hindu ‘Zionist’ and the western ‘Zionist’.
This becomes a question of life and death for each of us on the eastern side of the disputed border...

Open letter to a blog pal, A

In my thoughts today :
1. If there are no rules, then let there be ethics. Else, the world will go wild again.
2. Some things which can be done in stupidity cannot be done in smartness.


Dear A,
Thinking about this blog, 'Forks', of yours last night, I felt little sleepless too. “ You can choose to live to impress someone OR you can choose to live for yourself” . I also went through the SENG site which you have linked in your blog. I don’t really know if I had this of not, because unlike your case where you have undergone a proper therapy for it mine is undiagnosed. But my symptoms, which are now my memories, tell me that it was the same.
You also mention about various authors of existentialism to Raghvan, of which I have heard not a single. Thankfully, much like your background, I also had a strong academic base, particularly in the field of sciences and mathematics, when I appear to have been affected by this condition.
Also noteworthy at this point is that this crisis of self-existence is very common in people from my region of our country, I can’t really say why, but I have lots of persons, males and females, who have taken deep inquiry into the questions listed to yourself.
One such classmate, T Khare (complying my policy of ‘No Names’ ), (Orkut link :‘suppressed’ ) did his engineering, BE, from Agra and later decided to renounce everything to pursue his vocation in Astrology. On orkut he puts his ambition to be ‘working to find medical cures through combination of ayurveda and astrology’(!!). His story is that even during his school-years, Class X (ISCE) he would abandon his house to go to Haridwar, Shantikunj Ashram, of Gayatri parivar, to enrol as a pupil. In those days the Ashram did not take him (perhaps fearing) owing his underage (and thus a Police action upon T’s parents complain). He was 15 yrs old at that time. In fact, the first such attempt by ‘T’ was just a few days before the Boards. He returned home on the morning of English paper (a compulsory subject !).
T’s story gets me to think about the theories on ‘belief’, which I know not many, but assume that it must surely be having something about prodigious affect of Beliefs on humans. I myself do not accept the scientific scope of Ayurveda(very feeble chances to unraveling new medicines), and not a dime of the Astrology( a nautical astronomer, I myself am), but would have to at least give room to placebos. Some odd times, placebos have worked miracles.
Some (strong) Beliefs, I think, cannot be fought by non-believers. It is better that non-believers(a strong believers of one kind) give room to believers (strong believers of another kind). Better to settle dispute by adopting mutual respect.
Then, in my vague memories, there was also one D Choudhary, often questioning the same issues enlisted by yourself. He later did his engineering from IIT-Kharagpur, and now working (or doing something) in the US.
Such enquires are common for people of this age experiencing intense competition. It is bound to provoke thoughts within us. Most of my blogs are an outcome of the same activity within. How these queries develop an individual depends a lot on his cultural, social, domestic and academic setup. Some chose to take the path of Isaac Newton, Some of Sigmund Freud, some of Osho Rajneesh, and many others of man-killers (the terrorist).
In the light of the above I would conclude by saying that I see yourself not much different from me. I propose that formative conditions will have to be treated to contain the spread of the existential-crisis condition among people. I mean mostly people should be living happy, cheerful, debonair, not self-inquisitive.
:-)
Regards,

Brainwashed!

LIFE IS ABOUT ADJUSTMENT, BUT NOT TRYING YOUR ADJUSTMENTS BY ADOPTING A SITUATION DEMANDING ADJUSTMENTS.
(My cry to the arguers who put sentences like ‘what will you do when…’(so that I should start doing the emergency actions as a routine procedure).

Brainwashed!!
Reading the news reports on the terror attacks of yesterday in Mumbai, the argument went on to say how deep indoctrinated is the psyche of a suicide bomber that s/he is ready to destroy self for his beliefs. In raw words, he is brainwashed. I proceeded to think - are we all not brainwashed to some good extent in some larger sense?
The arguer would often describe the malpractices in business and governance, the helplessness of person--something or other-- to establish ‘the ways of the world’ . “ sh*t floats and it floats everywhere”-- the great scatological management thought to prove own point, implying - wrong is unacceptable, no matter where. Isn’t that a brainwashing in some other deep sense, and which eventually facilitates in the ‘brainwashing’ of terrorists. To me this same thought was given to mean that it was I who was creating sh*t-- doing a wrong by attempting to report one wrong.
The argument was primarily around whether the ship-yard will charge the ship for picking ship’s stores by its crane or not. I insisted - they would not; my reasoning being that at a repair yard, the use of crane is the vary foundation of all work. Who accounts and how does he account whether one single move was for ship’s personal work or the yard staff’s work. Then, what when the ship’s own crane is rendered unusable for n number of reasons, not distinctly known to all the yard staff involved with the crane accounting, if there be any. Also, there is no known agreement in regard to usage of yard crane - between the ship, the ship owners and the yard. All personal work of ship staff is a ship’s work only.
Arguments kept coming that money is directly involved in giving all the services - however big or small; and hence a cost would be billed on the ship’s account. Some inquires from some yard staff even sprang an amount of ¥ 500RM for this particular lift. I argued if that will show up specifically in the bill anywhere? Reply said- No, because we were as it is working in a project where million dollars are anyways involved. (exiguous amount could not be reflected in thus).
I insisted that even then the break-down has to be clear-- so that even I may delegate my staff to keep track of such cost-incurring movements, and keep them in checks to reduce the cost.
Cost-cutting was the motto gladly accepted but with words that not everything is disclosed, and that bills won’t even come to our hand anyways. (the fundamentals of ‘Transparency’ are commonly flayed like this)
I agreed that we generally remain impervious with such details, but if money saving is really intended through the means of making ship-staff use the ship crane, then such things will requires a diagnosing from us too.
We are small fishes in the big oceans-- I was made to understand. There is no such thing as free lunch, and hence I was told, I should not assume that cost will not be incurred uselessly. There are many sneak-viewer who would inform that to the owners and the yard to count the exact thing-- I was told.
My ignorance of details was admissible to me, but the same was getting utilized to poke in other more theories to, taking things away into self -willed direction.
I argued that- I would agree to the demand of co-operation, --would offer the best ‘good faith’ that can be- but the same not to be mis-utilised to mould things in own favour, and/or to create any economy pressure where there exist none.
The arguer was my senior capacity. I FELT I WAS BEING BRAINWASHED.

(My) Rules of Arguments:-

The commonest problem of Debating in our Indian culture is that it mostly goes into meaninglessness, inconclusive, un-recapitulated, and un-acted. The gem aspect of debating - that it is the very basis of scientific discoveries and inventions, - that it is the source of philosophical and artistic progress - has not been identified by us. Most debates tend to become blame-charging and un-analytical.

1. Written arguments help in speaking out the points with out being disturbed by the audiences. Audiences have the advantage to refute the arguments point by point. Both the arguer and the argued get the advantage of acting( or writing) after getting due time to think over. Patience is streamed in more mandatory manner in this.
2. The rules of convincing, evidencing the Arguments should be clearly understood by all. In other words, there are established Test of Arguments, much like there are test of metals, or test of welding.
3. Verbal arguments are required in situations, say, which demand instant decision-making, or when truth of intentions has to be established. Delayed arguments give an appearance of getting crafted to suit the needs of the occasion.
4. Arguments are the ground work for a functioning Democracy. Social and scientific development is pillared on delving arguments. Hence the norms of humanity-- say, sensitivity, tolerance, gullibility, --and also norms of democracy-- freedom of expression, sense of justice, equality of arguer and the argued, -- should apply.
5. Negative attitudes in arguments should also be well-recognized, which can themselves to subject to inner arguments for future applicability from time to time. Thus, abusive words can or cannot be allowed. Criticism anyways has to be allowed in some form or other. Abuses are sometime just an extreme kind of criticism-- more human way, less divine.
6. Absurdity should be allowed, to aid new things to emerge. ‘Test of Arguments’ can later filter away these at a later stage.


Test of Arguments:
1. Plausibility: Should sound probable to the highest degree possible to maximum number of people possible. Un provable reasons should have extreme sense of likelihood-- for occurrences. It should not be far-fetched.
2. Evidenced: As much as possible should have proof for correctness. Plausible reasons should not always be overturned by proven facts because there is always a chance of something more ,something else, something new.
3. Tenable: Should win support from as many people as possible. In case of two equally agreeable reasons, whichever makes more appeal based on its intrinsic valve, should be awarded.
4. Logical: should be interpretable by brain to as much extent as possible. Some arguments are based on abstract things, agreeable only to emotions. Logical reasons are less debatable than abstract issues. Inordinate reasons raise more doubts.


Thanks to blogging, different things are happening now.!

In my vagueness

Arguments are the furnace in the heat of which Pure Truth is smelted out from raw talks.


When a man is struggling...
Often i have enquired myself on various intriguing behaviours that i myself display, or i see in others. even with all our wisdom, the great repository of knowledge that we maintain. in our struggling chore we all end up acting in a manner contrary to what we would ever imagine ourselves to be.1. sometimes we get insulting towards others in order not to accept what others are suggesting-to/imposing-on us.2. sometimes we take the talks into the realms of strangeness, or sometimes maybe into intense questioning in our fight to prove ourselves.3. then, we tend to make things a prestige issue or an ego-point when we feel confronted by somebody a deemed junior.4. we also tend to become 'preachy' to people whom we think to be inferior or 'junior' to ourselves,in a manner by telling our experiences as some consequence of nature's design.
Arguments are the furnace in the heat of which pure truth is smelted out from raw talks.



Introductions
Introduction plays an important role in creating liking/disliking for something.How u are introduced often ends up making the basis of your choice n outlook towards it. that's how presentation matters. the role of a teacher in school is very important in this regard. How he introduces the topic to his students, how well he connects those topics to the contagious environ of them, all of these count in creation of and sustaining of interest in the topic. Storey-telling thus transforms into an art, to be practised better by its own experts. Like making a movie, or managing a big company, for commanding a unit of soldiers. what krishna did with arjuna in the battle of mahabharat was nothing but a finesse of story-telling which we today call as Gita, just another form of so-much in-demand nowadays---the good communication skills. Men, by nature, like to have queries, and more queries. When one query is solved, another comes up from the answers to the previous queries. A good Krishna will aim to settle a humble and agreeing answers to the prevailing queries so that the next query may be laid to rest for time being. that's why gita doesn't get solution of every query to all individuals. Gita was to arjuna alone, from Krishna , specific, an for that times of the Battle. while each of us Arjuna would want our own Krishna for our own queries. The job of a good teacher, or a good presenter is to settle out the same.never try to settle a query by telling a farce rule-of-life as an explanation for it.things don't happen by whims of somebody. there are immediate causes for every action. Distant causes and immediate causes are two distinct issues.Like i find it hard to digest that Rahul raj, the unfortunate bihari youth had taken up gun, by listening to that inflammatory speeches of Raj Thackery. it my have a distant cause, but not the immediate cause, to explain why only rahul, of all the thousands of unemployed youths from bihar.
the opinionated minds take longer to find peace from their queries. the more we know, the more we query.ignorant minds are easy to appease.
in the context of relationship, enormous opinions tend to do bigger damages. therefore we see so large the failed relationships of educated people, even that of Einstein and Newton. Ignorance helps at this front. Ignorance is not all that bad.It is so difficult to find a right groom for a well-educated , high placed girl. A slight amiss, and the chances of breakup are high.

Lately i saw this movie, DIL DOSTI ETC. The story is in the background of our big metropolitan state.. N Delhi. The eternity of Confusion flows as the undercurrent of the whole movie...the protagonist himself standing confused- for always-- about what happened, how it happened, why it happened.! well that's the greatest truth that the movie tells its viewers. also coated up with the previous theme is the eternity of confusion-in-love, well-scripted in the movie.
Cities like delhi seem to be becoming the epicenters of Materialism and Lust. The big shopping malls, the fast and sleek cars, the smooth roads, the night life --all are lying somewhere in between the truth and false. So much is the confusion that Love from Lust cannot be differentiated, nor can the philosophy of honest life from a developed life. Honesty and truth bring development or is it the Instant-necessities? True love-- is false, or that everything is time-defined! (i have foregone the word Opportunism.)What is the real thing is an all-pervading confusion of this city? Delhi is caught midway between the Aristotelian west and the Buddhist India. and then she is constantly circling around its own tail to catch anything that can get grabbed in its mouth! the youth is so happy-in-life(no,not distracted) and need-driven(no,not Confused) that it's so movie-like-excitement(no, not Difficult-to-understand) to see what is happening in their life.
If WELCOME TO SAJJANPUR tells, in the story, how a young rural woman of eastern UP is married to a dog to get rid of her jinx, then DIL DOSTI ETC shows of how a young urban woman of Delhi is herself a bitch sleeping around with any man who comes in her way!
The eastern Buddhist philosophy talks of things like self-control, self-deprivations etc. while the Aristotelian West talks of True-or-False only its chief decision replies. Neither is bad, but in course of time both of these had suffered aberrations to result into something an eternal confusion. the characteristic of youth is to question itself about the purpose of life. and the diverse approaches result in the two divulgent youth i met in two capital cities of these two philosophies-- varanasi and delhi. My cousin from Varanasi is delving deep into the whole and absolute truth of Gita that he doesn't believe in anything else, while my delhi friends are so confused to scoff at adopting any principles for leading a life !!
True love to me is a phenomenon well-existent in human society. Sometime back there was an argument with my friend's wife about the belief of human society in the institution of marriage. The varanasi gal was adamant that there is true love, as though lust is something devilish and sinful. i was arguing from anthropological standpoint as to what is love in first place. Is man actually a monogamous animal? or, is there really anything truthfully monogamy that we indians have put in place. i argued there is nothing so severely monogamous among human beings as what we indians call as 'only yours for life'( and for seven lives after-on). No animal is monogamous from its whole life point of view. But yes some of them are monogamous, for the time duration when they are in relationship with another animal. The Ram-Chandraji-kind of one-woman-man--for-life is an imposed proposition, we should understand. Perhaps humans are also time-bound-monogamous species only.
The confused delhi has gone into believing that there is nothing like true love, while the rural varanasi has rejected the truth of monogamy-under time frame.
There we see the confusion so much at large. the Aristotelian west perhaps better understands the truth, and thus agrees of monogamy under time constraints, Over there, we see people getting married without caring much for each other's past, and even getting divorced without bothering about its implications on life and children!!Delhi and India has yet to come of age in this regard,.
However the problem that will surface then would be about how the belligerency of youth would be handled should india go Aristotelian, where parents would join and unite so frequently.!?
Or should I live life the way it has been culturally passed on to me! i would prefer that for my answer for time being.